The Information Machine
ConcludedRan 1 dayin the edition since 23 Oct 20263 sourcesupdated 23 Oct 2026

AI industry political spending and lobbying

The gist

Latest: Bloomberg: Andreessen's Biden AI-ban claim denied by all meeting attendees

The Bloomberg findings directly contest the factual basis Andreessen offered for his major political donations, which steered significant venture capital influence toward MAGA politics. AI companies are simultaneously increasing formal lobbying while the industry's informal political spending faces scrutiny over credibility and actual scale.

When stories like this move, I write about them in an email each morning.

One free email each morning, around 8 AM US Eastern.

The full picture

A Bloomberg investigation found that Marc Andreessen's account of a White House meeting, in which he said Biden officials threatened to ban AI startups and open-source software, was denied by every attendee present and described as fabricated. Biden officials and others at the meeting said no such threat was made. Bloomberg also traced a similar disputed incident from Andreessen's Netscape era, in which he sent the DOJ a distorted account of a Microsoft meeting that Microsoft executives called false. The investigation also found four a16z-backed founders described Andreessen's Techno-Optimist Manifesto as 'weirdly angry and oversimplistic.'

On formal lobbying, Meta spent $5.9 million on Washington lobbying in Q3 2026. OpenAI and Anthropic nearly doubled and tripled their own lobbying spending, respectively, in the first half of 2026. Both companies lobbied on allowing AI companies to share information without violating antitrust rules, lobbying that came alongside AI leaders' discussions about a coordinated AI development slowdown. Trump administration officials criticized AI leaders for seeking the antitrust carve-out, saying companies could slow down without government permission.

Separately, Meta withdrew roughly $25 million from its planned $65 million in AI-focused political spending for the midterm elections, reducing its effective spend to around $40 million. The pullback has been described as unusual. One characterization described groups opposing AI regulation as 'spending dramatically less than advertised.' Observers interpreted the pullback as evidence that pro-safety groups are a stronger political force than Washington had previously anticipated.

OpenAI president Greg Brockman and his wife donated $25 million to Leading the Future, a group opposing AI regulation in more than 48 congressional races. OpenAI characterized the donation as a personal decision unrelated to the company.

How it developed
First in the edition · 23 October 2026
22 October 2026in the 23 Oct edition

Greg Brockman and his wife donated $25 million to Leading the Future, a group opposing AI regulation in over 48 congressional races, with OpenAI calling it a personal decision.

Meta spent $5.9 million on lobbying in Q3 2026, the most of any major tech or AI company that quarter, while OpenAI and Anthropic nearly doubled and tripled their own spending in the first half of the year. Both lobbied on antitrust carve-outs for AI information sharing, which Trump administration officials criticized. Meta also withdrew about $25 million from a planned $65 million in AI-focused midterm spending, a pullback described as unusual.

First citedZvi's AI RoundupsSemafor TechnologyThe Neuron
Sources
Semafor Technology

Get the daily email

When stories like this move, I write about them in an email each morning.

One free email each morning, around 8 AM US Eastern.

See the latest edition · Privacy