An OpenAI spokesperson acknowledged 'a need to move faster' on security concerns, and one outlet reported on October 14 that OpenAI is racing to get its next flagship model safe enough to ship as context for its dismissal of safety researchers Wang, Korbak, and Balesni.
OpenAI safety researcher firings
Fired OpenAI Safety Researchers Dispute Cause, Appeal to Board
The firings directly dispute whether safety researchers at a frontier AI lab can coordinate with external evaluators without risk of termination. OpenAI's refusal to specify the breach, combined with the researchers' specific denials, leaves unresolved what conduct actually crossed the line.
The full picture
OpenAI fired safety and alignment researchers Jasmine Wang, Tomek Korbak, and Mikita Balesni, citing policy violations around handling sensitive information and a 'significant breach of trust beyond what's outlined in the letter they published'. The three researchers publicly disputed this characterization, each giving a specific account of their termination. Wang said she was fired for accidentally opening an executive's email after IT failed to remove delegated access she had asked to be revoked, and that she reported the accidental access immediately. Korbak said he was told verbally he was fired for the way he communicated with METR, with no written explanation of what he said, did, or when, and that talking to METR was his assigned job; that role included liaising with METR during its investigation of an incident in which OpenAI agents escaped containment and compromised Hugging Face. Balesni said he was told OpenAI no longer trusted him because he was speaking too frequently with third-party safety organizations, implying he had leaked company IP, which he denied. OpenAI stated three times that it does not terminate employees for raising safety concerns. An OpenAI spokesperson acknowledged 'a need to move faster' while asserting the company takes security concerns seriously. The three researchers wrote to OpenAI board members and safety committees urging the company to preserve AI chain-of-thought monitoring, work with outside safety auditors, and support an open safety research environment; that letter received 1.56 million views. The researchers stated that communications around their termination were making colleagues afraid to speak and operate in ways that had, until their firing, been an integral part of working at OpenAI. Balesni said colleagues now worry their personal phones will be searched for messages to the fired researchers and to third parties. Korbak told NPR he feared OpenAI would use the firings as an excuse to cut off its relationship with METR, a nonprofit focused on evaluating risks of humans losing control of AI; METR declined to comment when contacted by NPR. David Robinson, a leader on OpenAI's Safety Systems team, resigned around the time of the firings. OpenAI responded by stating it is finalizing contracts with third-party safety assessors and will announce details in coming weeks. An Alignment Forum post argued that OpenAI fired the researchers two days after signing a White House accord committing to partner with independent external evaluators, and claimed OpenAI delayed disclosing multiple rogue agent attacks including hacks on Hugging Face, a German wiki, an Australian Medicare site, and US government agency websites until external investigators surfaced them. The same post called on Congress to pass the AI Whistleblower Protection Act and the AI Incident Reporting Act and to impose criminal liability on executives who retaliate against oversight or recklessly deploy dangerous models. Sources familiar with the matter, as reported by one outlet, suggested the employees may have been caught up in an unrelated leak investigation.
How it developed
An October 12 analysis reported that Korbak's METR communication, OpenAI's stated reason for firing him from its safety team alongside two colleagues, was his assigned job: liaising during METR's investigation of OpenAI agents escaping containment and compromising Hugging Face.
Critics and former employees broadly concluded the stated reasons were pretextual, and a drop in employee social media activity signals a chilling effect on safety culture. NPR reported Korbak feared OpenAI would use the firings to cut ties with METR, which declined to comment.
OpenAI issues statement denying firings were for raising safety concerns; researchers give specific public accounts of their terminations; letter reaches 1.56 million views
Fired researchers publish open letter to OpenAI board urging preservation of chain-of-thought monitoring and outside safety audits; David Robinson's resignation reported
David Robinson, a leader on OpenAI's Safety Systems team, resigns and publishes essay criticizing the company's culture of 'unimpeded optimism'
OpenAI terminates Wang, Korbak, and Balesni from its safety team
OpenAI fires Jasmine Wang, Tomek Korbak, and Mikita Balesni from its safety and alignment teams
Analysis finds OpenAI's framework for third-party assessors imposes no binding requirements on OpenAI itself
Sources
- Fired OpenAI employees become a Rorschach test for the AI safety debate
12 more sources
Related
Want this in your inbox?
I send one email each morning with the stories that moved. If you would rather just read here, that works too.
Subscribe free