OpenAI spotlights Scav robotics community experiment with GPT-6 Astra controlling a robot arm
OpenAI's GPT-6.1 Terra model
Latest: OpenAI Releases GPT-6.1 Terra at $1/M Input, Half Cost of Sol
Terra offers near-flagship agent benchmark performance at a fraction of the cost, which directly affects the economics of deploying AI in automated workflows. The pricing positions it as a practical option for high-volume use cases where cost and speed outweigh peak capability.
When stories like this move, I write about them in an email each morning.
One free email each morning, around 8 AM US Eastern.
Check your email.
I have sent you a confirmation link. One click and you are in.
Not in your inbox? Look in spam or promotions. If it's there, mark it "Not spam" so future editions land in your inbox.
The full picture
OpenAI launched GPT-6.1 Terra on October 26, a fast mid-range model priced at $1 per million input tokens and $5 per million output tokens. That is roughly half the cost of GPT-5.6 Terra and GPT-6.1 Sol, and about one tenth the cost of GPT-6 Astra. The model targets computer use, visual reasoning, coding, and business automation rather than being OpenAI's most capable offering. OpenAI engineer Ted Sanders described Terra as better than Astra and Sol at technical communication, comparable on vision and computer use but much faster, and somewhat weaker on most other tasks. On an internal coding benchmark, Terra scored 50.3% compared to 21.5% for predecessor GPT-5.6 Terra, with hallucination error rates dropping from 53.6% to 16.7% at low reasoning effort and to 4.3% at maximum reasoning effort. Terra performs on par with GPT-6 Astra on certain professional agent benchmarks while costing one tenth as much per token and running more than 3x faster than both Astra and GPT-6.1 Sol. Simon Willison positioned Terra as analogous to Anthropic's Sonnet tier, noting that sitting between the cheapest and most expensive options makes use-case selection less obvious. Willison found that max-reasoning use can still be slow and costly at the task level, with a single pelican benchmark run costing 11.3 cents and taking over four minutes, and characterized the release as not a bombshell for subscribers, noting it may help those hitting usage limits or wanting faster computer use.
How it developed
Study finds Jev classifier matches GPT-6 Astra accuracy on RAG claim checking at 187x lower cost but with higher false-positive rate on unsupported claims
OpenAI launched GPT-6.1 Terra on October 26 at $1/million input tokens, roughly half the cost of GPT-5.6 Terra and GPT-6.1 Sol, scoring 50.3% on an internal coding benchmark against 21.5% for its predecessor and matching GPT-6 Astra on certain professional agent benchmarks at one tenth the price and more than 3x faster.
A paper from October 22 on GPT-6-Astra in robot tasks found one long episode consumed roughly 9 million tokens, and the authors concluded task-specific data, heavy compute, and physical constraints block near-term deployment.
Paper evaluating GPT-6 Astra on 12 robot benchmarks published
Association for Human Mathematics criticizes OpenAI's release of 722 math manuscripts and urges mathematicians to stop collaborating; Terence Tao reposts AHM's statement on his blog
Sources
- Anthropic Launches Claude Haiku 5.5 at 75% Lower Average Cost
- Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 5.5 release
- OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol release
- Google DeepMind releases Gemini 3.7 Flash at half the price of 3.6 Flash, with large coding gains
BackgroundFrontier models, open models, and how they are compared
Get the daily email
When stories like this move, I write about them in an email each morning.
One free email each morning, around 8 AM US Eastern.
Check your email.
I have sent you a confirmation link. One click and you are in.
Not in your inbox? Look in spam or promotions. If it's there, mark it "Not spam" so future editions land in your inbox.