Two Fed Presidents Say AI Demand Is Now Lifting US Inflation
Two sitting Fed presidents have publicly attributed a portion of current US inflation to AI infrastructure spending, making it a named factor in monetary policy deliberations. That attribution raises the prospect of continued rate hikes and creates a direct feedback loop between AI investment and its own financing costs.
New York Fed President John Williams and Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee have both said that AI infrastructure investment is contributing to broader US inflation. Williams said AI demand is driving up semiconductor prices, construction costs, and power equipment costs enough to appear in national inflation data, and that supply is unlikely to catch up for several years. Goolsbee said AI-boom inflation is "jumping out of its lane," affecting parts of the economy beyond the AI sector. Williams expects one more rate hike may be appropriate in 2026 but sees no need for further increases in 2027. The New York Fed survey put one-year inflation expectations at 3.9% in September. Williams noted that 10-year yields above 5% are already tightening borrowing conditions and making data center financing more expensive. Goolsbee said the Fed would continue raising rates if inflation remains persistent, and economists are uncertain whether traditional monetary tools can effectively curb infrastructure-driven inflation. Higher rates could in turn raise borrowing costs for AI companies, creating a feedback loop.
Analysis published October 15 argues AI capital spending is nearly immune to higher borrowing costs because high real returns push real interest rates up regardless of Fed policy, raising the question of whether rate hikes can reach this inflation source.
New York Fed President John Williams and Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee said October 14 that AI infrastructure demand is lifting costs enough to register in national data, with Goolsbee calling it inflation 'jumping out of its lane'.
Analysis describes AI capital spending as nearly immune to higher borrowing costs, raising the question of whether monetary authority becomes irrelevant at high investment returns
I send one email each morning with the stories that moved. If you would rather just read here, that works too.
Subscribe free